Analisis Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Holistik: Integrasi 360-Degree Feedback dan Critical Incident Technique dalam Konteks Politeknik

Abdul Tahir; Duddy Arisandi

doi:10.59031/jkpim.v4i3.846

Authors

Abdul Tahir Politeknik Sorowako
Duddy Arisandi Politeknik Manufaktur Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59031/jkpim.v4i3.846

Keywords:

Penilaian Kinerja, 360-Degree Feedback, Critical Incident Technique, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Politeknik

Abstract

Penilaian kinerja merupakan elemen krusial dalam manajemen sumber daya manusia (SDM) untuk memastikan efektivitas organisasi dan pengembangan karyawan. Namun, banyak sistem penilaian tradisional masih bergulat dengan masalah subjektivitas, kurangnya transparansi, dan minimnya fokus pada pengembangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi sistem penilaian kinerja yang berlaku di Politeknik XXX dan mengusulkan kerangka model yang mengintegrasikan 360-Degree Feedback dan Critical Incident Technique (CIT) untuk mengatasi kelemahan tersebut. Menggunakan analisis survei deskriptif dan analisis kesenjangan (gap analysis) pada data Politeknik XXX , ditemukan bahwa sistem saat ini bersifat top-down, minim umpan balik multi-sumber (rekan sejawat dan mahasiswa 0%), lemah dalam pencatatan kejadian kritis (18.5% untuk prestasi, 29.6% untuk pelanggaran), serta memiliki skor komunikasi hasil penilaian (2.07/5.00), kepuasan, dan keadilan yang moderat (2.96/5.00). Kesenjangan signifikan teridentifikasi pada aspek transparansi (gap 2.29), orientasi perbaikan (gap 2.08), dan rekam kejadian kritis/CIT (gap 2.07). Implikasi dari temuan ini menunjukkan urgensi transformasi menuju sistem manajemen kinerja modern yang mengedepankan objektivitas, transparansi, dan pengembangan profesional berbasis data. Integrasi 360-Degree Feedback dan CIT diyakini mampu menyediakan perspektif holistik dan bukti perilaku faktual yang diperlukan untuk penilaian yang lebih adil dan formatif.

References

Abraham, S., Aaziya, A., Shanmugapriya, I., Mathew, J. M., Prabu, G., & Poreddy, B. (2024). A Study on Impact of 360 Degree Performance Appraisal and It's Effect on Job Performance; A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(2), 3072–3078.

Alam, S., & Suryani. (2024). Komparasi Metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa. Digital Transformation Technology (Digitech), 4(1), 558–567.

Al-Jedaia, Y., & Mehrez, A. (2020). The effect of performance appraisal on job performance in the governmental sector: The mediating role of motivation. Management Science Letters, 10(9), 2077–2088.

Balakayeva, G., Zhanuzakov, M., & Kalmenova, G. (2023). Development of a digital employee rating evaluation system (DERES) based on machine learning algorithms and 360-degree method. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(20230008).

Efanda, R., Yuswardi, & Maryanti. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Di Universitas Jabal Ghafur Menggunakan Metode 360 Degree Berbasis Web. Sagita Academia Journal, 2(2), 104–107.

Emam, S. M., Fakhry, S. F., & Abdrabou, H. M. (2024). Leaders development program by 360 degree feedback: reflection on head nurses’ leadership practices. BMC Nursing, 23(772).

Fan, C., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). A Consensus-Based 360 Degree Feedback Evaluation Method with Linguistic Distribution Assessments. Mathematics, 12(1883).

Fazri, R. A. (2021). Perbandingan Simple Additive Weighting Dan Weighted Product Pada Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan (Desa Cisarua). Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi, 8(1), 273–286.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

Lelavijit, K., & Kiattisin, S. (2020). An Integrated Conceptual Model of 360-Degree Performance Appraisal and Candidate Forecasting Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Journal of Mobile Multimedia, 16(4), 449–476.

Liu, K. (2025). Enhancing Intercultural Communicative Competence and Oral Cultural Expression: A Two-Phase IPA Framework Using Film-Based Critical Incidents and Theme-Based Activities. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(3), 1–26.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2012). Performance Appraisal: Methods and Rating Errors. International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 14(1), 7–9.

Meghdad, R., Nayereh, R., Zahra, S., Houriye, Z., & Reza, N. (2020). Assessment of the performance of nurses based on the 360-degree model and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method (FMCDM) and selecting qualified nurses. Heliyon, 6(3), e03257.

Obisi, C. (2011). Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 92–97.

Rushina, K., Sharma, D., Santhanalakshmi, K., Preetha, P. N., & Karthikeyan, K. (2024). A Study on Impact of 360-Degree Performance Appraisal and its Effect on Job Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 20(S15), 90–102.

Staszkiewicz, M., & Peszko, A. (2024). Identification of Academic Teacher Competencies Using Critical Incident Technique. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, (200), 458–469.

Sureda, E., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., & Sesé, A. (2021). A Training Intervention through a 360° Multisource Feedback Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9137.

Tsai, W. C., & Chen, H. C. (2010). Integrating the perspectives of self-review and others’ feedback: A review of empirical findings. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 291–318.