Implementasi Pasal 32 UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Transaksi Fintech

Authors

  • Aditya Sulistyo Budhi Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Widi Nugrahaningsih Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Ety Isworo Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59031/jnts.v3i3.737

Keywords:

Data Protection, Fintech, ITE Law, Law Enforcement, OJK

Abstract

The misuse of personal data in financial technology (fintech) services, particularly in peer-to-peer lending practices, is showing a worrying upward trend and is an urgent legal issue that requires addressing. Article 32 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE) serves as a primary legal basis for protecting electronic data. However, the effective implementation of this article in the context of fintech services still faces various challenges. This study employed an empirical legal approach with a combination of literature study and interviews. Interviews were conducted at the Surakarta Financial Services Authority (OJK) Office and with a number of fintech service users as respondents. The results showed that approximately 70% of personal data misuse cases originated from illegal online lending services. The most frequently reported violations included unauthorized use of data (40%), access to contacts and galleries on personal devices (35%), and threats of personal data dissemination (25%). The main obstacles in implementing Article 32 of the ITE Law include the difficulty of tracking perpetrators' jurisdiction, technical limitations in digital forensics, and low public legal literacy. Therefore, policy integration with Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) provisions in POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 is necessary. This study recommends strengthening regulations, establishing an independent supervisory authority, increasing public education, and utilizing digital technology to promote more effective personal data protection in the Indonesian fintech ecosystem.

References

Adam, R. C. A., & Adam, C. (2024). Perlindungan data pribadi nasabah peminjam dalam layanan pinjaman meminjam berbasis teknologi informasi berdasarkan hukum perlindungan data pribadi. Review Unes. Diunduh dari https://review-unes.com

Atlantis Press. (2021). Juridical overview of online loan transactions (fintech) dari perspektif UU ITE & PM 20/2016. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com

Fauzi, R., & Hidayati, M. N. (2024). Kebijakan penal dalam perlindungan data pribadi nasabah fintech lending di Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.964

Ghifari, A. (2024). Implikasi pengesahan UU PDP bagi pengguna layanan dalam pelaksanaan fintech P2P lending (Skripsi, Universitas Sebelas Maret). Diunduh dari https://digilib.uns.ac.id

Jurnal Nusantara. (2023). Perlindungan data pribadi dalam transaksi keuangan digital: Harmonisasi UU PDP dan regulasi fintech. Jurnal Nusantara. Diunduh dari https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id

Lubis, M., & Maulana, F. A. (2010). Information and electronic transaction law effectiveness (UU-ITE) in Indonesia. Proceedings ICT4M 2010, C13. IEEE.

UIA Veritas Journal. (2024). Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. Veritas UIA. https://jurnal.uia.ac.id

UPNVJ Esensi Hukum. (2023). Implementasi UU Perlindungan Data Pribadi terhadap keamanan informasi. Esensi Hukum, 5(2), 115–131. https://journal.upnvj.ac.id

Rahmazani. (2022). Problematika hukum penerapan UU ITE di Indonesia setelah revisi 2016. Mimbar Hukum UGM, 34(1), 161–175. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id

Rolib, S. (2022). The effectiveness of use of electronic signatures in banking transactions based on ITE Law. Legal Isha Journal. https://legal.isha.or.id

Syntax Literate. (2025, Mei 7). Membangun kepercayaan digital melalui penegakan hukum perlindungan data. Syntax Literate, 10(6). https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id

SAGITA, T. R. (2022). Analisis yuridis normatif dalam layanan pinjaman online ilegal berbasis fintech di masa pandemi Covid-19 berkaitan dengan RUU PDP (Skripsi, Universitas Nusa Putra).

Norsyaheera, A. W., Lailatul, F. A. H., Shahid, S. A. M., & Maon, S. N. (2016). The relationship between marketing mix and customer loyalty in hijab industry: The mediating effect of customer satisfaction. In Procedia Economics and Finance (Vol. 37, pp. 366–371). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30138-1

Santoso, A. P. A., dkk. (2021). Metodologi penelitian hukum: Suatu proses berpikir dalam penemuan hukum. Jombang: Nakomu.

Winarno, B. (2020). Kebijakan publik era globalisasi. (hlm. 139).

Risdwiyanto, A. (2016, 22 Februari). Tas kresek berbayar, ubah perilaku belanja? Kedaulatan Rakyat, hlm. 12.

Reddit.com. (2022). Nasabah dari fintech diduga ilegal melapor ke Polda Metro Jaya setelah data pribadinya disebar ke kontak. https://www.reddit.com

Merdeka.com. (2022). Tian (mahasiswa), korban fintech resmi, datanya disadap dan disalahgunakan oleh debt collector. https://www.merdeka.com

Downloads

Published

2025-08-04

How to Cite

Aditya Sulistyo Budhi, Widi Nugrahaningsih, & Ety Isworo. (2025). Implementasi Pasal 32 UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Transaksi Fintech. Journal of New Trends in Sciences, 3(3), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.59031/jnts.v3i3.737